Nebo wins best Goals-based Investing Platform at WealthManagement.com Industry Awards in NYC
Now in its 9th year, the WealthManagement.com Industry Awards program (the “Wealthies”) recognizes companies, organizations and individuals that support financial advisor success. A record-breaking number of nominations were submitted this year - over 1,000 entries were received from more than 400 companies. ultimately honoring 80 companies and executives in the wealth management space. The Industry Awards acknowledges firms that are bringing new innovations to market that make a real difference to the daily activities of financial advisors. The new Goals-based Investing Platforms category is a reflection of how asset managers are currently investing to provide new tools and technology for advisors to better tailor recommendations and implement financial planning themes into their investment management services. If a client has no volatility limit and is sufficiently early in their glidepath, Nebo will often recommend a 100% allocation to stocks. But while this makes sense given math, past returns, etc., a little paranoid voice inside my head questions whether it’s prudent to be 100% allocated to a single asset class. What would Ben say to that paranoid voice? Read Ben's Answer by downloading the whitepaper.
Webinar Replay: “Dear Allocator:
Is It OK to Own 100% Stocks?”
Our survey found 81% of advisors distinguish between shorter-term and longer-term capital market assumptions, but only 58% think it is OK to own 100% stocks for a client. Yet, the strong evidence of the mean-reverting nature of stocks and an equity risk premium relative to bonds suggests there are circumstances where it makes sense for a client to own 100% stocks, subject to the client’s time horizon, return requirements, and risk composure. If a client has no volatility limit and is sufficiently early in their glidepath, Nebo will often recommend a 100% allocation to stocks. But while this makes sense given math, past returns, etc., a little paranoid voice inside my head questions whether it’s prudent to be 100% allocated to a single asset class. What would Ben say to that paranoid voice? Read Ben's Answer by downloading the whitepaper.
Exciting Nebo Announcement
We are pleased to announce a major milestone for GMO's portfolio design platform, Nebo, which has surpassed $1 billion in platform assets one year since its September 2022 launch. Nebo (for Needs-Based Optimization) is a continuation of GMO’s history of research and innovation in areas including asset allocation, quality investing, and quantitative strategies. Nebo is not just a portfolio construction engine, it is a paradigm shift in risk assessment, redefining risk as ‘not having what you need, when you need it.' Nebo uses a proprietary multi-period shortfall optimization – built on a decade of deep research and user-led development – to generate personalized client portfolios that seek to minimize shortfall risk and align to each client's financial plan.
Our favorite recent post
podcast logo
microphone
Martin Tarlie
calendar
August 2023
Flirting with Models Podcast: Bridging the Gap Between Financial Planning and Portfolio Management
This episode is all about re-thinking risk in the context of financial planning and portfolio management. How do time and wealth constraints impact portfolio choice? Martin stresses most is that it’s the reformulation of the problem being solved that ultimately leads to a more pragmatic solution for allocators. If a client has no volatility limit and is sufficiently early in their glidepath, Nebo will often recommend a 100% allocation to stocks. But while this makes sense given math, past returns, etc., a little paranoid voice inside my head questions whether it’s prudent to be 100% allocated to a single asset class. What would Ben say to that paranoid voice? Read Ben's Answer by downloading the whitepaper.
Listen to Podcast
arrow

Recent Highlights

studio
Webinar Replay: “Dear Allocator:
Is It OK to Own 100% Stocks?”
Webinar Replay: “Dear Allocator:
Is It OK to Own 100% Stocks?”
Our survey found 81% of advisors distinguish between shorter-term and longer-term capital market assumptions, but only 58% think it is OK to own 100% stocks for a client. Yet, the strong evidence of the mean-reverting nature of stocks and an equity risk premium relative to bonds suggests there are circumstances where it makes sense for a client to own 100% stocks, subject to the client’s time horizon, return requirements, and risk composure.
Watch Replay
arrow
wealthstack
Presented on the mainstage at WealthStack’s Innovation Demos
Presented on the mainstage at WealthStack’s Innovation Demos
It's what return do they need from their assets in order to achieve their goals? (Hollywood, Florida – May 23)
Watch Replay
arrow
napfa
Nebo Featured in NAPFA:
Are Financial Planners Stuck in the 1970s?
Nebo Featured in NAPFA:
Are Financial Planners Stuck in the 1970s?
Standard financial industry practice builds retirement portfolios using mean-variance optimization and validates them using Monte Carlo simulations that assume asset returns are a random walk. To put a finer, more brutal point on it, managers construct portfolios using technology from 1952 and then have the temerity to check the results using assumptions from 1970.
Read Article
arrow
Sponsored at Pershing INSITE’s® 2023 advisor conference
Sponsored at Pershing INSITE’s® 2023 advisor conference
We keep hearing about the three “…izations:” customization, personalization, institutionalization.
arrow
How do I create a scalable service but provide personalized solutions?
Enjoyed this Tweets
a-miller
Andrew Miller
Great episode and discussing a problem that as gotten little attention but affects almost everyone.
m-maker
Michael H. Baker
The client is the hero.



/ end

Stay Current with Our Latest Insights

Please check reCaptcha
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.